News

Trade credit insurance claims hit nine-year high

There were more insurance claims made across England and Wales to cover the non-payment of debts in the first quarter of this year than at any time since 2009. That is according to data from the Association of British Insurers (ABI), which reveals that the number of claims jumped by 50% on the previous three months to reach 3,966 This coincided with a 13% increase in the number of corporate insolvencies recorded, with the collapse of construction giant Carillion having a far-reaching impact on businesses. “This is a tough time to be in business and it is not getting any easier,” ABI assistant director, head of property, commercial and specialist lines,” Mark Shepherd, said. “The collapse of Carillion dramatically highlighted how the ripple effect of a company failure can have a devastating impact throughout the supply chain.” The ABI data is based on the records of trade credit insurers AIG, Atradius, Coface, Euler Hermes, Markel International, QBE, Tokio Marine HCC, XL and Zurich. It was found that 44 new claims were made every day during the first three months of this month – the highest number recorded since the third quarter of 2009. The value of domestic claims paid hit a record-breaking £54m, with no other quarter ever seeing that much paid out Shepherd said the commercial environment remains challenging for customers, suppliers, and insurers, but that the latest figures highlight the safety net trade credit insurance provides “Never has the importance of trade credit insurance been greater – the survival of any business could be at risk without it,” he continued. “With too many firms at the mercy of non-payment of debts, the time has come for trade credit insurance to become an essential part of every businesses’ contingency planning.” http://www.theactuary.com/news/2018/06/trade-credit-insurance-claims-hit-nine-year-high/

Trade credit insurance claims hit nine-year high Read More »

Ga. Justices Toss Punitive Damages Against Surety for Conservator’s Theft

The Georgia Supreme Court ruled that punitive damages a probate judge entered against the conservator could not be levied against the insurance company that provided the surety bond. The Georgia Supreme Court has ruled the issuer of a surety bond is not responsible for a $150,000 punitive damages award a probate court levied against it and the conservator of an incapacitated woman after the judge determined the conservator had looted the funds. The finding overturns a Georgia Court of Appeals ruling that left Ohio Casualty Co., which served as the surety for the conservator, on the hook not only for $167,000 in misappropriated funds, but jointly and severally liable for $150,000 in punitive damages as well. “Our argument was that there’s never been a case in Georgia where a surety was assessed for punitive damages unless the statute calling for the bond—which are required by law—specified that penalties were available,” said Bovis, Kyle, Burch & Medlin partner Tim Burson. “These bonds are essentially guarantees that guardians and estate administrators will fulfill their fiduciary duties,” he said. “Probate cases like this are ripe for people who don’t just mishandle the estate’s assets, but get sticky fingers and actually take money. If the lower courts’ rulings had stood, such relatively pricey bonds could have been more difficult for sureties to write, he said. “These bonds have become among the hardest to get, and they’re getting harder. To conceptualize that we could be responsible for unlimited punitive damages is one of those things that make us take a second look,” said Burson, who represented Ohio Casualty Insurance and parent Liberty Mutual, along with firm partners William Bryant and John Burch. The attorney for the current conservator, Richard Neville of Cummings’ Neville & Cunat, declined to discuss the case. Craig Oakes of Lawrenceville’s Bryant & Oakes, who represents the now-replaced conservator, Emanuel Gladstone, said the decision “speaks for itself.” As detailed in the justices’ ruling and other documents, the case began in 2015 when Forsyth County Probate Court Judge Lynwood Jordan Jr. appointed Gladstone to be the conservator for his wife, Jacqueline, who suffered from dementia. Jordan set a $430,000 bond that Ohio Casualty posted and appointed an attorney to oversee the management of the conservatorship. Several months later, the attorney raised concerns that Emmanuel Gladstone had not provided a proper asset management plan and was making unapproved expenditures. Jordan removed Gladstone and appointed another conservator. Following a hearing, Jordan issued an order finding that—while some of Emmanuel Gladstone’s expenditures were justified—there were improper withdrawals from the account, including $80,000 he withdrew just before Jordan replaced him. Jordan ordered Gladstone and Ohio Mutual to repay $167,000 and, finding Gladstone breached his fiduciary duty, another $150,000 in joint and several punitive damages. Ohio Casualty immediately paid the $167,000, Burson said, then both Gladstone and Ohio Casualty filed separate appeals with the Georgia Court of Appeals, with the surety challenging only the punitive damages awarded against it. In March 2017, the appeals court upheld both the actual and punitive damages award against Gladstone and Ohio Casualty. In the section dealing with Ohio Casualty’s appeal, the appeals court found that, while the relevant law “requires that a conservator’s bond ‘be in a value equal to the estimated value of the estate,’ if it is secured by a licensed commercial surety, it does not necessarily follow, as the surety argues, that recovery is limited to actual loss.” Read More … https://www.law.com/dailyreportonline/2018/05/11/ga-justices-toss-punitive-damages-against-surety-for-conservators-theft/

Ga. Justices Toss Punitive Damages Against Surety for Conservator’s Theft Read More »

sba logo

SBA Recognizes the Office of Surety Guarantees Award Winners

WASHINGTON, June 13, 2018 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — The U.S. Small Business Administration recognizes the Office of Surety Guarantees award winners for their continued work to help small contracting businesses acquire surety bonds Three SBA surety bond partners were selected to receive awards based on their participation, activity, claims and recovery and their commitment to helping small businesses obtain contracts with both government and private sector entities. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America was recognized as Surety of the Year. The Fedeli Group and Marcia D. Smith of Bond Specialist were honored as Surety Agency of the Year and Surety Agent of the Year, respectively. Bill Manger, Associate Administrator for the SBA’s Office of Capital Access said, “Our partners in the Surety Bond Guarantee Program have done an incredible job helping America’s small businesses and these awards are a testament to the importance of the work being done to help entrepreneurs obtain bonding and compete for contracts in a strong U.S. economy.” Surety of the Year award recipient, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, has been a participant in the SBA’s Surety Bond Guarantees preferred program since 1990, and has assisted small and emerging contractors over the years through their Construction Services Express program in Exton, Pennsylvania. For more than 160 years, Travelers has earned a reputation as leading property casualty insurer. Their expertise and focus on innovation have made them a leader in personal, business and specialty insurance. “We are proud of our partnership with the Small Business Administration, and extremely honored to receive its designation as Surety of the Year,” said Bob Raney, Senior Vice President for Construction Services, Bond & Specialty Insurance at Travelers. “Travelers has a long history of helping contractors of all sizes and trades succeed, and we look forward to continuing our dedicated work with the SBA.” Surety Agency of the Year, the Fedeli Group, is a locally owned, multi-line insurance agency located in the Cleveland, Ohio suburb of Independence. They have been working with the SBA since 2007, writing bonds and insurance in Ohio, the surrounding states and much of the United States. Founded in 1988, the Fedeli Group works closely with their clients providing consultative services and innovative solutions to their risk management needs. Surety Agent of the Year, Marcia D. Smith of Bond Specialist (dba Marcia Smith Surety) entered the surety business in 1973, and worked for several major agencies and companies before starting Bond Specialist Insurance Services in 1990. Smith found the SBA Surety Bond Guarantees program to be a perfect partner for many of her clients. She placed her first client in the SBA’s SBG program in the late 1980’s and continues doing so today. The SBA Surety Bond Guarantees program has 32 surety partners and 350 active agents nationwide, and has guaranteed more than 10,000 bonds with a contract value of over six billion. More information about the SBA’s Surety Bond Guarantees program is available on the SBA.gov website. For further assistance, surety companies may contact the Acting Director of the Office of Surety Guarantees, [email protected]. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/sba-recognizes-the-office-of-surety-guarantees-award-winners-300665862.html

SBA Recognizes the Office of Surety Guarantees Award Winners Read More »

Was 2017 the Tipping Point for the Bail Bonds Industry?

OLDWICK, N.J.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–As reform measures across the United States significantly diminish or eliminate the need for defendants to post cash bail, the business currently handled by bail bonds agents and insurance specialists may cease to exist, according to a new A.M. Best special report. The Best’s Market Segment Report, titled, “Was 2017 the Tipping Point for the Bail Bonds Industry?” notes that critics of the U.S. bail system charge that it unfairly targets poor Americans, and now state and federal government officials have introduced numerous bills aimed at reducing cash bail as a means of pretrial detainment. Even narrow policy changes, such as the use of risk assessment tools created by data scientists and criminal-justice researchers, could help meaningfully diminish the use of pretrial incarceration across the country, though moves such as these pose a danger to the surety market’s bail bonds insurance sector. According to the report, declines have already set in, with bail bonds insurance premiums and face amounts falling in 2017, representing what looks to be a tipping point for the bail bonds industry. Net premiums written (NPW) at six of the top 10 writers of bail bonds insurance fell in 2017, and out of the nine companies whose surety bonds portfolios are composed solely or predominantly of bail bonds business, four saw a decline in NPW. For three of those four, the year-over year percentage drop was in the double digits. The total face amount of all bail bonds written increased every year from 2009 to 2016, but declined in 2017 by 4.5%, in line with the 3.8% year-over-year decline in NPW for the bail bonds segment. The legislative reform efforts advocated at federal, state and local levels have met heavy protestations from the bail bonds industry. Opponents of reform view the bail bonds system as a vital component of the criminal justice system and caution that current pretrial release systems in a number of states have led to what they have characterized as skyrocketing failure-to-appear rates and the release of dangerous criminals. With extensive reforms enacted either in 2017 or currently under consideration in a majority of states, a decided shift away from requiring money bail seems to be at hand. This appears to be particularly true with regard to misdemeanor and low-level felony cases and is likely going to be the rule more than the exception in the future. The impact could result in a significant shrinking of the surety bonds market’s bail bonds segment. A.M. Best believes that, although some surety companies have somewhat diversified portfolios, the potential impact of any reforms on the bail bonds specialty writers will be substantial. Companies that write bail bonds countrywide, or at least in multiple states, should be better able than single-state or even smaller regional insurers to adjust their strategies, and to focus on states where cash bail practices have not been substantially changed. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180607005572/en/Best%E2%80%99s-Market-Segment-Report-2017-Tipping-Point

Was 2017 the Tipping Point for the Bail Bonds Industry? Read More »

Kentucky amends law allowing surface coal mining and reclamation permit applications to submit their own bonds

At the beginning of April, Kentucky governor signed a bill that amends portions of chapters of the Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) that relate to mining. The 40-page bill introduces numerous new provisions with regards to different types of mining operations and procedures in the state. Among these are also a handful of requirements related to applicants and holders of surface coal mining and reclamation permits. These include a change to requirements related to hearings related to civil penalties, a different bonding requirement for such licensees, and a requirement regarding extensions to an area covered by a permit. For a brief overview of the changes that apply to surface coal mining and reclamation permit applicants, see below! Kentucky House Bill 261 House Bill 261 introduces a somewhat lengthy list of changes to KRS Chapters 350, 351, and 352 (see here for a summary of all changes). A number of these changes also relate to surface coal mining and reclamation permits in the state. In short, the amendments in the bill that concern these permits include: The removal of the requirement for civil penalty assessments to be placed in an escrow account prior to formal hearings related to the amount of such assessment The removal of the option for such permit holders to submit their own reclamation bonds without separate sureties in lieu of the performance bond required under existing law With the exception of incidental boundary revisions, extensions of the area covered by a permit can only be made through a separate application or an amendment to the permit Mining for limestone, dolomite, sand, gravel, clay, fluorspar, or other vein minerals cannot be conducted without a permit unless such mining is for personal, noncommercial use and complies with the requirements delineated in the newly created section KRS 350.240 to 350.280 The above are the most important amendments made by the bill to the provisions that concern surface coal mining and reclamation permit applicants and holders. If you are new to surety bonds, see the next section for a brief explanation of how bonds function and what a reclamation performance bond is. Surety Bonds for Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Surety bonds are a form of financial guarantee agreements often required by the state from various businesses as a pre-licensing requirement. These agreements serve the purpose of guaranteeing that licensed and bonded individuals and businesses will comply with the legal provisions for their profession. They further serve as a form of protection to the state and/or the public in cases in which a bonded party violates legal provisions, causing damages or losses. For example, the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA) requires that to obtain a coal mining permit, applicants must furnish a so-called reclamation performance bond. When a surety company issues such a bond for a mining company, it basically guarantees that the latter will comply with the reclamation plan approved in its permit. If the permit holder fails to reclaim the site as required by their permit, the bond serves as a guarantee that the state will have sufficient funds available to reclaim the site. These funds are covered by the surety company which backs the bond financially. In certain cases, instead of extending funds for the reclamation to be completed, a surety may be allowed to conduct the reclamation instead. Yet, in the end, if a surety covers a bond claim by extending funds, the bonded mining company must reimburse the surety in full. In other words, the surety only serves as a guarantee but the final liability is carried by the mining company itself. The change to the surety bond requirement in Kentucky may be a precaution on behalf of lawmakers to make sure that bonds posted by permit applicants are actually capable of serving the purpose they are intended for. What do you think about the Bill and its provisions? Will these changes affect mining companies in any significant way? Let us know what you think in the comments! Open + Home>Power>Kentucky amends law allowing surface coal mining and reclamation permit applications to submit their own bonds Kentucky amends law allowing surface coal mining and reclamation permit applications to submit their own bonds June 6, 2018 By Vic Lance, Founder and President of Lance Surety Bond Associates At the beginning of April, Kentucky governor signed a bill that amends portions of chapters of the Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) that relate to mining. The 40-page bill introduces numerous new provisions with regards to different types of mining operations and procedures in the state. At the beginning of April, Kentucky governor signed a bill that amends portions of chapters of the Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) that relate to mining. The 40-page bill introduces numerous new provisions with regards to different types of mining operations and procedures in the state. Among these are also a handful of requirements related to applicants and holders of surface coal mining and reclamation permits. These include a change to requirements related to hearings related to civil penalties, a different bonding requirement for such licensees, and a requirement regarding extensions to an area covered by a permit. For a brief overview of the changes that apply to surface coal mining and reclamation permit applicants, see below! Kentucky House Bill 261 House Bill 261 introduces a somewhat lengthy list of changes to KRS Chapters 350, 351, and 352 (see here for a summary of all changes). A number of these changes also relate to surface coal mining and reclamation permits in the state. In short, the amendments in the bill that concern these permits include: The removal of the requirement for civil penalty assessments to be placed in an escrow account prior to formal hearings related to the amount of such assessment The removal of the option for such permit holders to submit their own reclamation bonds without separate sureties in lieu of the performance bond required under existing law With the exception of incidental boundary revisions, extensions of the area covered by a

Kentucky amends law allowing surface coal mining and reclamation permit applications to submit their own bonds Read More »

Sompo International completes acquisition of Lexon Surety Group

Bermudian property and casualty (P/C) re/insurer Sompo International Holdings (SI) has acquired Lexon Surety Group (Lexon), the second largest independent surety insurer in the United States. Lexon is comprised of Lexon Insurance Company, Bond Safeguard Insurance Company and Fortress National Group. The acquisition is expected to positively impact the subsidiaries’ financial strength ratings. Lexon staff and office locations are to be integrated with SI’s Surety business under the leadership of Christopher Sparro, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of U.S. Insurance Brian Beggs, Executive Vice President (EVP), Sompo International Surety will lead the combined operation and will relocate to Lexon’s headquarters in Mt. Juliet, Tennessee. SI is to continue offering the same array of commercial and contract surety bonds, court and probate bonds, and U.S. Custom bonds products Lexon has offered since 2001. Commenting on the acquisition, Sparro said, “We are very excited to welcome Lexon into our U.S. Insurance operation. They have an excellent reputation and their technical underwriting proficiency is closely aligned with our corporate culture. The combined organization will be one of the ten leading insurers in the U.S. surety market, significantly contributing to our strategic expansion in the U.S.” Beggs added, “Lexon has a reputation for quality products and strong distribution relationships which are highly complementary to our current surety capabilities. Their nationwide network of agents and brokers coupled with expertise in specialty niches such as energy will enable us to substantially accelerate the growth of our primary surety portfolio.” https://www.reinsurancene.ws/sompo-international-completes-acquisition-of-lexon-surety-group/

Sompo International completes acquisition of Lexon Surety Group Read More »

Carl Icahn files lawsuit against AmTrust, controlling family

(Reuters) – Activist investor Carl Icahn filed a lawsuit on Monday against AmTrust Financial Services Inc (AFSI.O) and the family that controls the company, accusing them of trying to take the insurer private at the wrong time and at the wrong price. The lawsuit filed in the Court of Delaware accuses Karfunkel-Zyskind family of engaging in a transaction which will transfer “huge amounts of value” belonging to the company’s public stockholders to the controlling family. Earlier on Monday Czech-based Arca Capital, which own 2.4 percent of total outstanding shares of AmTrust, said it plans to work with Carl Icahn and other minority shareholders in opposing the proposed privatization transaction. Icahn had disclosed a 9.38 percent stake in AmTrust on May 17. On March 1, AmTrust said it would be acquired in a $2.7 billion deal by a group of shareholders including its founding family, chief executive officer and private equity funds – a move that Icahn has strongly opposed. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amtrust-fin-serv-stake-icahn/carl-icahn-files-lawsuit-against-amtrust-controlling-family-idUSKCN1IM1UJ

Carl Icahn files lawsuit against AmTrust, controlling family Read More »

Contractor wins motion for summary judgment [AmTrust]

ORLANDO — A Florida contractor was granted its request against a former partner, according to a May 7 opinion of the U.S. District Court in the Middle District of Florida Orlando Division. Defendant Archer Western Contractors, LLC was hired by the Florida Department of Transportation to help with the construction of the Central Florida Commuter Rail Transit Station Project (Sunrail Project). Archer then went into partnership with Prince Land Services Inc., whose responsibilities were to do landscaping and irrigation for the Sunrail Project. Developer Surety and Indemnity Company (DSIC), the plaintiff, operated as surety when it provided a subcontractor performance bond with Prince named as a subcontractor and DSIC as surety, and Archer as obligee. The working relationship went awry after Prince allegedly defaulted on the subcontract. DSIC requested a declaratory judgment that Archer violated the bond agreement when it hired another subcontractor to replace Prince. DSIC and Archer filed a motion for summary judgment after Archer filed a counterclaim and stated DSIC was the party to breach the bond agreement, that Archer was justified in hiring a replacement contractor, and that DSIC is responsible to pay Archer the cost of remediating Prince’s default. It also stated DSIC owes Archer $631,148.65 plus fees and cost. The district court denied DSIC’s motion for summary judgment. It stated Archer did not violate the bond when it replaced Prince amid its default. The court pointed out the company’s actions during DSIC’s notice that Prince was in default stopped DSIC from moving forward with settling Prince’s default. The district court pointed out that hiring the replacement company was a good move as DSIC was unable to solve Prince’s default status. The district court also ruled Archer didn’t breach the bond when it didn’t provide DSIC with information to prove Prince’s claimed breach. Considering this, the court denied DSIC’s motion for summary judgment. The court then granted Archer’s motion concerning its counterclaims in requesting a declaratory judgement that DSIC breached the bond, as well as claims the company is responsible for the costs of remediating Prince’s default. It found DSIC is responsible to Archer through the terms of the bond and subcontract. “Archer acted in accordance with the subcontract and the bond at every stage, while DSIC’s conduct breached the bond,” the court ruled.

Contractor wins motion for summary judgment [AmTrust] Read More »

Decade-old trouble comes to an end for Keystone Airpark [Hanover]

KEYSTONE HEIGHTS – After being awarded over $2 million in damages, the Keystone Heights Airpark can start repairing problems that started after the 2008 construction of two new hangars. About 10 years ago, in October 2008, the small airport entered into a contract with Pipeline Contractors Inc., a Starke-based company that was awarded the bid for a hangar construction project. Once Pipeline had finished, the airport started noticing problems with the work. The pavement outside and concrete flooring inside the two new hangars had started to heave upward and form cracks throughout. The airport stopped payment while officials looked into why the materials used in the project had failed. Their research determined the flaws were a problem with the sub-base layer used in the building process. In 2010, Pipeline filed a suit against the Keystone Airpark Authority for non-payment. Airpark officials answered back with a counter-suit, claiming breach of contract against Pipeline had resulted in the brand new and now-cracked taxiways and concrete floors surrounding their clients’ stored planes, as well as seeking payment from The Hanover Insurance Company who had taken out a performance bond on Pipeline’s fulfillment of the contract with the airport. About seven years after the suits were filed, they went to court for a seven-day trial in October of last year in Clay County’s Fourth Judicial Court with Circuit Judge Don Lester hearing the case “As is usual in construction disputes, there can be no question that a failure occurred,” Lester wrote in his judgment. “The core matter to be resolved by the court is why the failure occurred.” In his report, Lester starts by outlining Pipeline’s responsibility under the contract, which boils down to two things: the company is to provide all of its own work and materials, and guarantee that work and those materials after the project’s completion. Pipeline is also required to get approval of materials from the project’s engineer. It was discovered that Pipeline had used a material known as EZBase underneath the asphalt and buildings in the airport project. EZBase, though allowed at the time, has since been banned in Clay County after a 2013 vote from the Board of County Commissioners. The material is a byproduct of burning coal that was marketed and delivered in the area by the Jacksonville Electric Authority. The BCC vote came following environmental concerns and overall unpredictability of the material as well as a push to ban it outright in the state of Georgia. Soil samples from the site showed that EZBase was not necessary for this project as the soil maintained the necessary properties for use as a sub-base natively with no additives. Judge Lester wrote that the use of a sub-base material when none was necessary was a breach of Pipeline’s duty to material selection under the contract, furthering his point in that they breached the contract again by failing to get the EZBase material inspected or approved by the engineer before placing it at the site. Read More … http://www.claytodayonline.com/stories/decade-old-trouble-comes-to-an-end-for-keystone-airpark,11449

Decade-old trouble comes to an end for Keystone Airpark [Hanover] Read More »

JDG Associates Seeks President for Surety & Fidelity Association of America

May 15, 2018 – Rockville, MD-based search firm JDG Associates has been selected to find the next president of the Surety & Fidelity Association of America (SFAA). Lynn M. Schubert, the group’s current president, announced in December that she would be retiring at the end of this year. Paul Belford, principal at the recruitment firm, is spearheading the search. Ms. Schubert, who has led Washington, D.C.-based SFAA for 22 years, is assisting the organization’s search committee in finding her successor. Among her accomplishments, she was the first woman to head a national insurance trade association. The next president, who will oversee a $5.5 million annual budget and a full-time staff of 16, will be charged with providing vision, direction and leadership in promoting and preserving the use of surety and fidelity bonds in the public and private markets, said JDG Associates. The president provides the board of directors with information and guides the association in taking policy positions, and is responsible for advocacy of those positions. Broad Responsibility The president role includes responsibility for all aspects of SFAA’s work, including its member services as well as external activity, said the search firm. The leader manages the financial viability of the association, balancing services against current market conditions, and oversees and provides guidance to the board on all management issues, including staffing and benefits. The successful candidate will lead a highly regarded, financially sound association whose member company products protect the public interest in infrastructure and related projects nationally, said JDG Associates. The individual will work with highly-engaged senior-most executives of national and local companies who rely on the quality of its statistical resources and advisory services in the management of their companies. Ms. Schubert, the search firm said, is leaving her successor with a solid platform and position to promote and advance the benefits of surety and fidelity products. The next president will be expected to provide the leadership, management and motivational spirit needed to continue that success. SFAA’s next leader will also be expected to provide guidance to the board on all association-related issues as well as implement its policies and programs. The individual will act as the industry leader in promoting and protecting surety and fidelity bonds, strengthening policy maker and industry leader awareness of their benefits and utility, to include testifying before Congress and other bodies, as appropriate, said the search firm. A Range of Duties Other responsibilities will include: positioning SFAA as the industry expert for regulators, legislators and public entities on all matters related to surety and fidelity bonds; developing and supporting SFAA staff capabilities in all substantive, statistical, actuarial and legal matters related to surety and fidelity bonds, managing all officers and direct reports to ensure an effective, efficient and positive working environment throughout SFAA; serving as a trustee for the Surety Foundation, overseeing its activities and being a resource to it; and managing all fiscal matters including investment policies, reserve policies, and SFAA’s budgets, benefits, retirement plans, assessments and non-dues revenue generation, among other duties Candidates must at least have a bachelor’s degree, although a law degree is preferred. They should also have experience in insurance and finance fields; knowledge of the surety and fidelity field is highly desirable. Prospects must have leadership abilities, including experience in working with CEO-level executives of national firms, said JDG Associates. They must also have excellent oral and written communication skills, with a successful track record in representing an organization before policy makers and with industry leaders on legislative and regulatory matters SFAA would further like prospects to have had success in expanding an organization’s market reach, such as increasing private-sector use of surety bonding. Demonstrated success in working with a board of directors or similar body is highly desirable. Excellent relationship development skills, a collaborative mindset as well as success in consensus development are required. Candidates should also show strengths in strategic thinking and direction-setting as well as attention to detail. The job also calls for an understanding of the role and dynamics of a fully functioning and highly effective trade association. SFAA, founded in 1908, is licensed as a rating or advisory organization in all states and it has been designated by state insurance departments as a statistical agent for the reporting of fidelity and surety experience. SFAA serves as a trade association of more than 400 insurance companies that write the vast majority of surety and fidelity bonds in the U.S. Veteran Recruiters JDG Associates has been providing executive recruitment services to Fortune 1000 corporations, associations and non-profits, federal, state and local governments, research & consulting firms, and defense contractors since 1973. Mr. Belford has completed nearly 300 association searches during his career, mostly for CEO roles. A professional search consultant since 1990, he joined JDG Associates in 1993. His clients have ranged from regional and state groups with staffs of 10 or fewer to national organizations with budgets up to $75 million. He has worked with trade associations and professional societies from a wide range of service areas, including heavy industry, information technology, finance, healthcare, engineering, government relations, communications, finance and administration. https://huntscanlon.com/jdg-associates-seeks-president-for-surety-fidelity-association-of-america/

JDG Associates Seeks President for Surety & Fidelity Association of America Read More »

Scroll to Top
Document